Mr. John McKeon:

There is an issue which was discussed here, for example, last year, in the context of whether we should call issues where we suspect fraud as fraudulent cases with regard to people claiming benefit or whether we should delay the labelling of fraud until the person is found guilty in court. Defining whether something is bogus or not is a matter of judgment. We record strictly what are mis-classifications of employment. If it is subsequently found in court that a person was fraudulently presented as being self-employed and he or she was not, then one can label it bogus. Until then, to use the terminology we us, it is only suspected bogus, and we were asked not to use that term. We have to be consistent.