Mr. John Gleeson:

We analysed the impacts as well. If it is considered that it should have reported or could have reported a different result, what is the recommendation, which is the impact? It would have recommended an earlier follow-up such as returning in six months for another test or a referral to colposcopy. If that did not happen, then that is an impact. The Deputy referred to general standards, and acceptable ranges would be positive predictive values. We would want it high in the 80s, which it is. It is scoring-----