Ms Derville Rowland:

I think that is right. Subject to thresholds and dispute, if proved down the line, it may deliver a partial subset of the answer. The people would then have to experience two procedures, one after the other. The full and complete answer being arrived at once is a far better outcome than one lengthy legal dispute procedure delivering a partial fragment of an answer, which may be the lesser part of the damage to the individual, which must then be followed up with a different one. It does not seem to be the way to go.