David Cullinane (Waterford, Sinn Fein) | Oireachtas source

Mr. Culhane keeps saying that but I am not looking for context. Mr. Culhane said Mr. Barrett had stated that the matter was not going away and that he would not let it go away. The letter stated that Mr. Barrett had said the Commissioner should make a section 41 disclosure and that the matter should be reported to the Comptroller and Auditor General. Mr. Barrett had also stated that if the activities at the college were not fraudulent they were at best irregular. Which of these issues did Mr. Culhane find objectionable? Did he find all of them objectionable?