Catherine Murphy (Kildare North, Social Democrats) | Oireachtas source

It is all very well talking about that in academic terms. The restaurant was the vehicle through which money was sent to a private company, the Sportsfield company, which Mr. Culhane has no responsibility for. Is that right? Mr. Culhane knew all of this. He referred to his own 2008 report. He had an overview of this. Returning to the point about outputs and outcomes, did it never occur to Mr. Culhane that this should not be continuing? That this is wrong, that this money is voted for a specific purpose and it is not being used for that purpose. Where was Mr. Culhane's responsibility in that?