Frances Fitzgerald (Dublin Mid West, Fine Gael) | Oireachtas source

I will not oppose amendments Nos. 30 and 31. However, as I mentioned earlier, it is the practice in statute to define terms such as "psychologist", "psychiatrist" or "medical practitioner" and we should give consideration to including such definitions.

Amendments Nos. 35 and 38 relate to the evidence of psychologists, psychiatrists and medical practitioners. While I do not intend to oppose the amendments, I will need to consult and seek advices in respect of these amendments with regard to the medical confidentiality and ethical obligations of medical practitioners. I think Deputy O'Callaghan will understand that. I appreciate he has included provision for the person to whom the record relates to refuse disclosure of the record but I believe further consultation is required in respect to these amendments and it may be necessary to return to them at a later Stage.

In regard to amendment No. 33, I accept there may be some overlap with amendment No. 92 to section 27. Amendment No. 92 provides:

The Courts Service shall provide the Board with any Court documents requested by the Board and which evidence or record any recommendations of the Court that imposed sentence on the person seeking parole.

This is a matter I can raise with the Parliamentary Counsel and, if necessary, we can return to it. I will consult further with the Courts Service in relation to these amendments. I understand that Deputy Daly is not pressing amendment No. 34.