Charlie McConalogue (Donegal, Fianna Fail) | Oireachtas source

I welcome Mr. Kavanagh, Ms Eade and Mr. Morris and thank them for making the presentation. I acknowledge some members of HRI's board. Deputy D'Arcy spoke about some of the issues we dealt with at length at a previous meeting. I think we all agree that the process and corporate governance at that time left a bit to desired. It is important that lessons are learned by HRI. I acknowledge the strong role played by the horse racing industry in this country. We have a very proud history in respect of how it has been built up. Those in the sector played a role in respect of that. It is something we need to continue to build upon. As Mr. Kavanagh said, we have every right to be proud of where we stand as a world leader in the horse racing industry.

There are a few points that Mr. Kavanagh might flesh out. Brexit is an important issue, as it is for many other parts of the agriculture sector. Mr. Kavanagh outlined how it operates on an all-island basis so Brexit will pose challenges for the horse racing sector. I would be interested in hearing his perspective on what those challenges are and how we need to meet them. The export trade is significant. What issues do we need to be cognisant of to ensure that the horse racing industry is protected and can continue to grow?

The Curragh and Galway are very fine facilities. Comments have been made about the regional racing network, smaller courses and the investment spread - ensuring there is a good regional spread. Could Mr. Kavanagh comment on that because there is sometimes criticism about whether the investment is spread?

A number of members will have received correspondence and will been contacted about the foal levy. What is Mr. Kavanagh's perspective on that? Could he brief us on the outcome of the recent court case and where HRI currently stands? Some breeders have argued that an alternative structure should be put in place. Could Mr. Kavanagh outline HRI's position on that? Could he comment on the argument put forward by horse breeders that this levy should be based on the paid covering charge as opposed to the listed charge?