Clare Daly (Dublin Fingal, Independent) | Oireachtas source

I wish to comment very briefly. I feel bad about not having any questions but that is not because Dr. McVeigh's arguments are poor. On the contrary, the case he makes is so compelling. He has demonstrated clearly how out of sync we are, in terms of both law and policy, with our nearest neighbour. That argument is won.

We all understand the symbolic importance of the fact that ethnicity has been recognised in those jurisdictions but at a practical level, what has been the effect? Has it had an impact, for example, on the lack of visibility of Travellers, an issue raised by previous witnesses? In terms of society and policy making, has it had any impact? Were any special steps taken on foot of the recognition to introduce measures that would reduce marginalisation?

I agree with Dr. McVeigh's argument that cost is irrelevant where human rights are concerned. I also appreciate that the delivery of this is not going to involve huge costs. I am trying to understand why this has not happened here yet and it seems to me that the lack of delivery has been used to save money at the expense of a vulnerable section of society. The lack of recognition has allowed the State to disproportionately cut services to Travellers. Does Dr. McVeigh agree with that or have any comparisons he could make in that regard?