Maureen O'Sullivan (Dublin Central, Independent) | Oireachtas source

My first question is about the vacant site levy and the suggestion in the presentation that it needs to be reviewed. What does Mr. Davitt mean by that? The levy is currently 3% and I understand from the Minister that it was on the advice of the Attorney General that the date was set for 2019 and could not be before that. Can Mr. Davitt clarify what he meant in that regard?

We share the institute's concerns regarding NAMA's policy of selling to vulture funds as this could have disastrous consequences down the line. What would Mr. Davitt suggest to ensure there is some control in that area and in regard to those that have already been sold? Mr. Davitt mentioned smaller builders and I agree there should be a role for them. He said there should be an agreed price scheme for building, but as the Chairman stated, it has been difficult to get clarification or agreement on exact building costs. Is there a role for rural resettlement schemes also?

I represent Dublin Central where there are some appalling standards in regard to rental property. Dublin City Council conducted a review which found that 97% of rental properties were unfit for habitation. What is the role of IPAV in that regard?