Mr. Jim Mulkerrins:

In terms of training, perhaps my colleagues from the NCSE might assist us in this, the Department recognises that there is a challenge for training. It is a complex issue. A number of members raised the issue about, perhaps, the potential for in-service and so on. We agree entirely with our colleagues from IMPACT that SNAs are, on the whole, very willing to engage in training. We recognise that they are very open to the discussion. As has been mentioned, we recognise that many SNAs are significantly higher qualified than the minimum requirements laid down. None the less, we recognise there is a need for ongoing training. It is complex. For example, catheterisation, which is invasive, refers to a very small number of children. Obviously, the Department would not support CPD for every SNA in the State in that particular practice. It should only be available for those who are engaging in it. Similarly, Irish Sign Language is a requirement for some SNA positions and, again, it would not be appropriate to train everyone in Irish Sign Language. That is a common characteristic of the SNA scheme.

A varied group of tasks is undertaken depending on the actual care needs of the child. Clearly, the training that is required needs to be specific to the tasks being undertaken by the SNA rather than the general training made available to everyone. Part of that can be addressed through the recruitment process. One hires the right person for the job rather than have a general person. In the event that one wants somebody to do Irish Sign Language, ISL, if one can find someone who is able to do it and is willing to come in, that is fine, and maybe some ongoing training may be required. The Department is conscious of it and is open to it and we look forward to the recommendations of the report of this committee in that area.