Kathleen Lynch (Cork North Central, Labour) | Oireachtas source

I move amendment No. 256:

In page 65, between lines 28 and 29, to insert the following:“Validity and applicability of advance healthcare directive

58.(1) An advance healthcare directive is not valid if the directive-maker—

(a) did not make the directive voluntarily, or

(b) while he or she had capacity to do so, has done anything clearly inconsistent with the directive remaining as his or her fixed decision.

(2) An advance healthcare directive is not applicable if—

(a) at the time in question the directive-maker still has capacity to give or refuse consent to the treatment in question,

(b) the treatment in question is not broadly recognisable as the specific treatment set out in the directive that is requested or refused, or

(c) in the case of any specific treatment set out in the directive that is requested or refused, the circumstances set out in the directive as to when such specific treatment is to be requested or refused, as the case may be, are materially absent or different.

(3) An advance healthcare directive is not applicable to life-sustaining treatment unless this is substantiated by a statement in the directive by the directive-maker to the effect that the directive is to apply to that treatment even if his or her life is at risk.

(4) (a) An advance healthcare directive is not applicable to the administration of basic care to the directive-maker.

(b) In paragraph (a)“basic care” includes (but is not limited to) warmth, shelter, oral nutrition, oral hydration and hygiene measures but does not include artificial nutrition or artificial hydration.

(5) Where an ambiguity arises as to the validity or applicability of an advance healthcare directive—

(a) the healthcare professional concerned shall, in an effort to address the ambiguity—

(i) consult with the directive-maker’s designated healthcare representative (if any) or, if there is no designated healthcare representative, the directive-maker’s family and friends, and

(ii) seek the opinion of a second healthcare professional, and

(b) if, after the healthcare professional has complied with paragraph (a), the ambiguity still has not been addressed, the healthcare professional shall address the ambiguity in favour of the preservation of the directive-maker’s life.

(6) (a) Where a directive-maker lacks capacity and is pregnant, but her advance healthcare directive does not specifically state whether or not she intended a specific refusal of treatment set out in the directive to apply if she were pregnant, and it is considered by the healthcare professional concerned that complying with the refusal of treatment would have a deleterious effect on the unborn, there shall be a presumption that treatment shall be provided or continued.

(b) Where a directive-maker lacks capacity and is pregnant and her advance healthcare directive sets out a specific refusal of treatment that is to apply even if she were pregnant, and it is considered by the healthcare professional concerned that the refusal of treatment would have a deleterious effect on the unborn, an application shall be made to the High Court to determine whether or not the refusal of treatment should apply.

(c) In determining an application under paragraph (b), the High Court shall have regard to the following:

(i) the potential impact of the refusal of treatment on the unborn;

(ii) if the treatment that is refused were given to the directive-maker, the invasiveness and duration of the treatment and the risk of harm to the directive-maker;

(iii) any other matter which the High Court considers relevant to the application.

(7) (a) Subject to subsections (1)to (6)and paragraph (b), an advance healthcare directive shall be complied with unless, at the time when it is proposed to treat the directive-maker, his or her treatment is regulated by Part 4 of the Mental Health Act 2001 or he or she is the subject of a conditional discharge order under section 13A (inserted by section 8 of the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2010) of the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006.

(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), where a refusal of treatment set out in an advance healthcare directive by a directive-maker relates to the treatment of a physical illness not related to the amelioration of a mental disorder of the directive-maker, the refusal shall be complied with.”.