Ivana Bacik (Independent) | Oireachtas source

I thank the Chairman and the witnesses for their submissions. My background as a criminal lawyer means that I would disagree with the issue on perception and functionality of firearms. In terms of perception, it is very important when firearms are being used for illegal purposes. That is why we ban imitation handguns. Colleagues will be glad to hear I have only two questions.

I return to the issue of public safety and consistency of standards. Some of the witnesses, particularly Mr. Symes, spoke about storage and holding conditions. Many witnesses referred to inconsistency. The theme through many submissions is the very real concern of An Garda Síochána about thefts of legally held firearms. The witnesses' concern is that that fear is being used as a reason to drive more restrictive conditions.

Mr. Symes, in particular, pointed out that further security requirements, where deemed necessary to safeguard the public, could be discussed. I understand that the current conditions on holding and storage of firearms are based on guidelines and are not contained in primary legislation. Am I right in saying that there is no sanction for breach of those other than that the firearm holder could have his or her licence revoked in future? Would any of the witnesses agree with strengthening some of those provisions relating to, for example, the requirement for a gun safe, alarm and so on?