Oireachtas Joint and Select Committees

Thursday, 20 February 2014

Public Accounts Committee

2012 Annual Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General and Appropriation Accounts
Vote 9 - Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Chapter 23 - Revenue Collection
Chapter 24 - Management of Revenue Debt
Chapter 25 - Taxpayer Compliance
Chapter 26 - Corporation Tax Losses
Chapter 27 - Tax Audit Settlements

11:10 am

Photo of Derek NolanDerek Nolan (Galway West, Labour) | Oireachtas source

I thank Ms Feehily.

I want to move on to the issue of interest. Figure 27.4 is very interesting. It gives a regional breakdown of where interest and penalties were applied in 2012. The Revenue Commissioners have a large cases division that deals with significant tax issues. It also has a regional issues division, with which we are familiar from our constituencies. I refer to the local tax office, for example. If there is a large case with a lot of money involved, the individual concerned is much less likely to be charged interest and penalties than a small person in the regions or an individual not involved with serious money. The figures are stark. We see that a figure of 55% in interest and penalties was applied to the large cases, compared to an average figure of 75% or 76% in smaller cases. We see that, as a total proportion of the revenue taken in, only 6% is from penalties in the large cases, whereas the figure is 20% to 25% in smaller cases. How can we justify this means of distinguishing between cases?

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.