Oireachtas Joint and Select Committees

Friday, 20 December 2013

Public Accounts Committee

2012 Annual Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General and Appropriation Accounts
Vote 7 - Office of the Minister for Finance
NAMA - Annual Report and Financial Statements 2012

12:00 pm

Mr. Brendan McDonagh:

Absolutely; I fully accept that.

The Deputy raised the question of the losses suffered by the banks on the transfer of loans at a discount to NAMA. The average discount across the five banks that transferred loans to NAMA was 57%. The losses ranged across the banks from 44% up to 61%. The Deputy is correct that there were losses of €42 billion. The reality is that NAMA did not create these losses. They were created as a result of decisions on lending that were not sensible. The banks overlent on assets as part of an asset bubble in the mid-2000s. The markets had already decided that the banks had made losses and that it was just a question of quantifying them. We were charged with taking certain loans from the banks and the evaluation process agreed with the European Commission ensured the banks had to apply a certain valuation standard to the assets. That is the reason 88% of the valuations were accepted because they had met that standard. Some 12% did not. That proves there were checks and balances in the system.

On long-term economic value, in a previous report the Comptroller and Auditor General estimated that if NAMA had not bought the assets from the banks - it paid €32 billion for €74 billion worth of loans - a market participant would only have paid €26 billion. The log-term economic value is the difference between €32 billion and €26 billion. If the banks had sold on the loans to third party private equity firms, they would probably have only received €26 billion at most. That is the quantification of the long-term economic value. Again, an EU process determined this for state aid purposes and it is subject to rigorous audit.

On the question of a debtor being able to buy back his or her loans from NAMA, there is a specific provision in the NAMA legislation, section 172, which prevents NAMA from selling an asset back to a defaulting debtor. If a debtor is not servicing the principal and interest on his or her loans in full, he cannot buy them back. We are legally prohibited from selling to him or her.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.