Billy Kelleher (Cork North Central, Fianna Fail) | Oireachtas source

My first question is for Mr. Saunders of the Mental Health Commission. Mr. Saunders stated in his presentation that the commission is of the view that the reasonable opinion of the medical practitioner should (a) be required in writing, (b) follow an examination of the woman concerned and that (c) the reasons for the opinion should be provided. He then went on to define an examination. Head 5 of the Bill provides that the medical opinion should be in a form and manner prescribed by the Minister. Is Mr. Saunders suggesting that the Mental Health Commission's view of an examination and the reasonable opinion of the medical expert should be provided for in the legislation?

My next question is to Dr. Janice Walshe and Dr. Kevin Walsh. Has either doctor, in discussions with their peers or personally, ever come across a case whereby a woman because of her physical condition, and based on medical advice that her life was under threat if she received a particular treatment, opted to terminate the pregnancy? In other words, have they come across a case whereby following explanation to a pregnant woman that a particular treatment could have a profound impact on her life or the quality of life of the foetus, that woman decided to terminate the pregnancy as a life-saving measure?

My final question is on head 12 and relates to conscientious objection. Are the organisations happy with the heads of the Bill as prescribed with regard to conscientious objection?