Denis Naughten (Roscommon-South Leitrim, Independent) | Oireachtas source

From the evidence given by the Irish Medical Council and the Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists their firm position is that what they would like to see is regulations supported by primary legislation rather than the structure proposed under the various heads. Will the witnesses clarify this?

With regard to conscientious objection, what happens if in smaller units all three existing consultants decide they are not prepared to get involved in these procedures? Does this mean for any new posts created people's personal opinions would have to be determined before they could be recruited?

I have a question for Professor McAuliffe. She mentioned the destruction of the baby in her evidence. Does she believe there needs to be clarification in the legislation with regard to destruction versus induction? Will she comment on the evidence given earlier by Dr. Tony Holohan who stated early deliveries may have been carried out in this country on the grounds of suicidal ideation. Does Professor McAuliffe have any evidence of this?

Dr. O'Riordan made the point in her evidence that there needs to be more resourcing of perinatal psychiatry but Dr. Tony Holohan stated there was no need for additional resources in this area in that a perinatal psychiatrist will not necessarily be involved in these additional assessments.

The point was made that the current obstetric practice is that referrals would be made between 16 and 20 weeks. Is it not the case that referrals are being made later now because of delays in obtaining an appointment with an obstetrician? How will that affect determinations concerning a termination? Would it require earlier referrals and, on foot of that, additional resources to facilitate that?