Oireachtas Joint and Select Committees

Thursday, 21 February 2013

Public Accounts Committee

2011 Annual Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General and Appropriation Accounts
Vote 9 - Office of the Revenue Commissioners
Chapter 7 - Audit of Revenue 2011
Chapter 8 - Revenue Outturn 2011
Chapter 9 - Revenue Debt Collection
Chapter 10 - Increasing Tax Compliance

12:50 pm

Photo of John McGuinnessJohn McGuinness (Carlow-Kilkenny, Fianna Fail) | Oireachtas source

I will give Ms Feehily the benefit of my simple mind on it. Revenue collected €36 billion last year and is expected to collect €38 billion this year. The Government parties by way of policy decided that they wanted more taxes and then asked Revenue to collect them. They are, therefore, asking it to collect €250 million this year in the local property tax and double that amount next year. If I was in private business, I might not be able to increase demand that easily. Therefore, I would have to refer to my aged debt and my ability to collect and insist on collecting the money I was owed. There will always be someone who will not pay and there will always be a write-off. Running an aged debt figure of approximately 40%, taking all of what Ms Feehily said into consideration, including the fact that it reverts to the year it was owed and so on, is a considerable amount. If Revenue had the €669 million tied up in the appeals system sorted earlier and the investment in the various teams she described in place, the policy makers might not look at a new tax because Revenue was efficient in collecting taxes and sorting out the problems within the current tax system. Is that fair?

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.