Written answers
Tuesday, 5 November 2013
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Disadvantaged Areas Scheme Payments
Éamon Ó Cuív (Galway West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
876. To ask the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine when payment under the disadvantaged area scheme for 2013 will be paid to a person (details supplied) in County Galway; the reason for the delay in issuing this payment; if any reduction in stocking levels under his agri-environment option scheme 3 plan has been taken into consideration; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45954/13]
Simon Coveney (Cork South Central, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Payment has not yet issued to the person named under the 2013 Disadvantaged Areas Scheme as the holding has not yet satisfied the Scheme minimum stocking density requirements. As soon as the holding concerned is confirmed as having met these requirements, the case will be further processed with a view to payment at the earliest possible date thereafter.
Pat Breen (Clare, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
877. To ask the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the position regarding a disadvantaged area scheme payment application in respect of a person (details supplied) in County Clare; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [45982/13]
Simon Coveney (Cork South Central, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
Payment has not yet issued to the person named under the 2012 or 2013 Disadvantaged Areas Scheme as the holding has not yet satisfied the Scheme minimum stocking density requirements. Applicants must own, possess, hold and maintain livestock in order for them to be considered eligible for stocking purpose. While medical evidence has been received and considered, further processing revealed that a large number of animals were moved on to the holding of the person named through feedlot movement, as these animals were maintained on the holding but not in the ownership of the person named, they cannot be considered for stocking purposes.
No comments