Written answers
Wednesday, 18 April 2012
Department of Environment, Community and Local Government
Private Residential Tenancies Board
10:00 pm
Dominic Hannigan (Meath East, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context
Question 897: To ask the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government the number of cases the Private Residential Tenancies Board has brought in 2009, 2010 and 2011; the amount the PRTB cost the state in each of the past three years, including legal costs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19011/12]
Jan O'Sullivan (Limerick City, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I have no function in the operational matters of the Private Residential Tenancies Board (PRTB), an independent statutory body established under the Residential Tenancies Act 2004. While the PRTB received Exchequer funding for a number of years, it has operated on a self-financing basis since 2010. The Table outlines the Exchequer funding received by the PRTB from 2004 -2009.
Year | Exchequer Grant |
2004 | €154,266.00 |
2005 | €1,703,279.00 |
2006 | €2,973,787.00 |
2007 | €5,739,940.00 |
2008 | €3,812,417.00 |
2009 | €974,415.00 |
Details of the Board's income and expenditure are published in their annual reports and accounts which are available on the PRTB website www.prtb.ie. The most recently available annual report and accounts relate to 2010. The annual reports contain a wide range of statistics including data on dispute resolution figures.
Dominic Hannigan (Meath East, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context
Question 898: To ask the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government when the Private Residential Tenancies Board will press charges in a case (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [19012/12]
Jan O'Sullivan (Limerick City, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context
I have no function in the operational matters of the Private Residential Tenancies Board, an independent statutory body established under the Residential Tenancies Act 2004. Accordingly, it would be inappropriate for me to comment on the specifics of any individual case.
No comments