Ken O'Flynn (Cork North-Central, Independent Ireland Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

153. To ask the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform the number of instances in the past five years in which a Minister, Minister of State or senior official was required to recuse themselves from policy development or decision-making due to a declared conflict of interest involving a family member with financial interests in pharmaceutical or healthcare companies. [66573/25]

Jack Chambers (Dublin West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Ethics in Public Office Act 1995 sets out the procedures to be followed where an office holder such as a Minister or Minister of State finds that they or a family member have a material interest in a function of their office that falls to be performed.

The 1995 Act stipulates that where an office holder proposes to perform a function of their office in the scenario described in the Deputy’s question, he or she must provide a statement in writing of the facts and the nature of the interest concerned. This statement should be furnished before performance of the function or, if this is not possible, as soon as may be after the performance of the function. The question of recusal from performance of the function does not arise under the legislation.

If the office holder concerned is a Minister or Minister of State, the legislation provides that he or she will furnish any such statement to the Taoiseach and the Standards in Public Office Commission. Where the office holder concerned is the Taoiseach, he or she must furnish any such statement to the Chairman of the Standards in Public Office Commission. Any other office holder will furnish any such statement to the Commission.

Given the explicit reporting lines set out in legislation that I have described above, the Deputy will appreciate that my Department holds no information on any such statements made, and I have no such statement to report on my own account. Senior officials are treated separately under the legislation. If they find themselves in the situation described in the Deputy’s question, the 1995 Act requires that they do not perform the function concerned unless there are compelling reasons to do so and where they propose to perform the function they must furnish before (or if not reasonably practicable as soon as may be after) such performance, a written statement detailing the compelling reasons to the relevant authority, which would, in this case, be the Secretary General of the Department.

Details of any such statements are a matter for the relevant Department or office concerned and my Department does not hold any centralised records in this respect. In the case of my own Department, I am informed that no statements concerning the matters in the Deputy’s question have been made to the Secretary General in the past five years.

Ken O'Flynn (Cork North-Central, Independent Ireland Party)
Link to this: Individually | In context

154. To ask the Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform if her Department has issued any guidance, circulars or instructions to Government Departments since January 2020 on the management of conflicts of interest in emerging medical or technological policy areas, including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and other gender-affirming treatments for young people. [66574/25]

Jack Chambers (Dublin West, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context

The Ethics in Public Office Act 1995 and the Standards in Public Office Act 2001 (collectively cited as the Ethics Acts) provide a legal basis for the management of conflicts of interest by elected and appointed public officials at national level. Under this statutory framework, it falls to the Standards in Public Office Commission, which is independent in the performance of its functions, to provide guidance for public officials on their compliance with the legislation and this is available on the Commission’s website.

The Code of Standards and Behaviour for Civil Servants, which falls under the policy responsibility of my Department, sets out the values, standards and behaviour expected of civil servants and includes certain general provisions on the management of conflicts of interest by civil servants. The Department has not issued any specific guidance, circulars or instructions on the matters specified in the Deputy’s question.