Written answers

Tuesday, 11 October 2022

Photo of Róisín ShortallRóisín Shortall (Dublin North West, Social Democrats)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

284. To ask the Minister for Finance the action, if any, which he intends to take in respect of a senior civil servant (details supplied) in light of the findings of a recent report which raises serious public interest questions about this person’s compliance with the Civil Service code of standards and behaviours, especially in respect of Sections 6 and 7, and potentially Section 14; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [50307/22]

Photo of Paschal DonohoePaschal Donohoe (Dublin Central, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

On 7 September, the Taoiseach published the Final Report of the Commission of Investigation (IBRC) on the transaction in relation to Siteserv and the principles and policies within IBRC on interest rates. This extensive report outlined the transaction, makes various adverse findings against individuals and made various recommendations.

The Code of Standards and Behaviour for the Irish Civil Service applies to civil servants of the Government, as well as civil servants of the State. I note that the Report refers to an individual who has been working in the Department of Finance since November 2013. Therefore, at the time of the transaction, the individual was not employed within the Irish Civil Service but rater worked in Davy, a financial adviser to Siteserv.

It was a function of the Davy adviser to encourage credible bidders for the company in order to maximise the sale price, thereby minimising losses to IBRC and ultimately to the State. The Commission found that this individual made an unauthorised disclosure of confidential information regarding the sale process, however there is no suggestion that the individual concerned disclosed the information for any personal gain or for any reason other than to enhance the sale process in which he was engaged. Aspects of the confidential information in question were provided to all bidders in the Siteserv sale process, as was always the intention.

The disclosure of confidential information by the Davy adviser to an individual which the Commission states he trusted, and which was subsequently transmitted without his knowledge, does not form part of the findings outlined by the Commission in Chapter 22 regarding the commercial soundness of the Siteserv transaction.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.