Written answers

Tuesday, 11 July 2017

Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht

National Monuments

Photo of Clare DalyClare Daly (Dublin Fingal, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

352. To ask the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht her views on the recommendations of the report of a group (details supplied). [32998/17]

Photo of Clare DalyClare Daly (Dublin Fingal, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

353. To ask the Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht further to Parliamentary Question No. 307 of 27 June 2017, the basis on which she decided that some groups and political representatives should be included while three campaign groups were excluded. [32999/17]

Photo of Heather HumphreysHeather Humphreys (Cavan-Monaghan, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I propose to take Questions Nos. 352 and 353 together.

I refer to my replies to Questions Nos. 307, 308, 322, 323, 324 and 325 on 27 June 2017 and to previous Dáil Questions in which I have welcomed the report of the Moore Street Consultative Group and the consensus-based approach it recommends to finding an optimal solution to the future of Moore Street that appeals to all stakeholders.

The structure of the Consultative Group and of the successor body I have established in response to the overarching recommendation of its report, represents and comprehends the aggregate of interests and points of view that exist in relation to this historic site. The objective has been to accommodate the broadest spectrum of the many overlapping groupings of stakeholders that have grown up around the issue and the consultation processes that have been put in place has also facilitated and encouraged effective input and contributions from all such interested parties, including those named by the Deputy.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.