Seanad debates
Tuesday, 14 July 2026
Nithe i dtosach suíonna - Commencement Matters
Child and Family Agency
2:00 am
Chris Andrews (Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
The next speaker is Senator Mark Duffy, who probably has not gone home since the weekend.
Mark Duffy (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I will be staying here until the Mayo team takes Sam Maguire home.
Chris Andrews (Sinn Fein)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
You never know, Senator, this could be your year.
Mark Duffy (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank the Minister of State, Deputy Higgins, for being here to discuss this very important topic. I acknowledge the work the staff of Tusla do in County Mayo and across the country in very challenging circumstances and with very vulnerable people. They respond when others cannot and do not. While there are lots of different views and angles, with some cases getting a huge amount of spotlight, 99% of cases go unheard of because the outcome is a very positive and meaningful impact on young people's lives and on families, community life and society generally.
I seek an update on the development of headquarters for Tusla in Mayo. Discussions and work have been ongoing since 2023 with a local developer. A lot of time, resources and finances have been invested in the proposal for a site on Moneen Road, Castlebar, which would serve the whole county. It is a very ambitious plan for which permission was granted in 2023. At least €300,000 has been spent on it to date. I would welcome an update to provide clarity on the future of the project.
Emer Higgins (Dublin Mid West, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank the Senator for raising this important issue and offering me the opportunity to respond on behalf of the Minister, Deputy Foley.I also thank the Senator for his comments on the staff who work in Tusla in very challenging and often vulnerable circumstances. It is good to put that on the record of the House.
It is also important to acknowledge that decisions relating to the acquisition or leasing of properties by Tusla, and indeed all public bodies, require careful consideration. Such decisions must balance long-term needs with the responsibility to secure value for taxpayers’ money, particularly where significant financial commitments are involved.
Regarding the specific situation in Castlebar that the Senator has raised, Tusla has indicated that following careful consideration, including extensive negotiations, which he referred to, and legal mediation with the developers, it was unable to reach an agreement. It has now concluded that the proposal did not represent a viable option. Unfortunately, this means Tusla has decided not to proceed with this development.
Although this proposal will not move forward, that does not diminish the importance of meeting service needs in the area. The Minister has asked me to directly reassure the Senator, and indeed the local community, that Tusla has secured a medium-term accommodation solution for Castlebar and remains actively engaged in identifying a sustainable long-term solution for the area at the earliest opportunity.
With regard to the background, and as the Senator has touched on, this project was designed on the basis of a 30-year operational lease, with the primary objective of delivering value for money over the lifetime of that lease. As part of its assessment, Tusla benchmarked the proposed rental and service charges against comparable facilities, including similar projects within both Tusla and the HSE. Following this review, Tusla concluded that the costs sought by the developer did not represent value for money over the proposed lease term. While the developer cited construction inflation as justification for the increases, Tusla determined that the level of increases sought could not be supported. In an effort to reach agreement, Tusla offered a significant uplift on its original offer. However, this was rejected by the developer. In the circumstances, Tusla concluded that any further cost increase could not be justified from a value-for-money perspective.
More broadly, the objective of any public service leasing or construction project is to meet service needs while ensuring the best use of public funds. Success is measured not only by delivery on time and within budget but by the long-term value and benefits of a project.
Effective projects begin with clearly identified service needs and are underpinned by strong governance, robust planning and sound decision-making. Careful planning and preparation are essential. The strongest projects are those that invest in feasibility studies, site assessments, stakeholder engagement and detailed design from the outset, because decisions made at the earliest stage often have the greatest impact on cost, quality and operational performance.
I appreciate that challenges such as inflation, supply chain disruption, planning delays and unforeseen site conditions may arise and may need to be managed to protect budgets, timelines and projected outcomes. These considerations highlight why value for money must underpin every stage of project delivery. It is about more than just securing the lowest cost option. It is also about achieving the right balance between cost, quality, efficiency and long-term benefit. To achieve this, public bodies must take a whole-of-life approach to decision-making. That is what happened here. These are the principles that have informed Tusla’s consideration of the proposal in Castlebar and ultimately led to the decision not to proceed in this instance.
Again, while this proposal will not move forward, it does not diminish the importance of meeting the service needs in the Senator’s area. The Minister wishes to reassure the Senator and the local community that Tusla has secured a medium-term accommodation solution for Castlebar and that she will continue to work towards a long-term solution.
Mark Duffy (Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank the Minister of State for being here on behalf of the Minister, Deputy Foley, and for her detailed reply. While it is disappointing to hear the news here, at least it provides clarity and certainty for the project promoters and, indeed, staff and various stakeholders involved, many of whom have been in touch with me and are really passionate about ambitious and quality infrastructure to support Tusla and its needs.
The Minister of State mentioned that effective projects begin with a clearly identified service need and are underpinned by strong governance, robust planning and sound decision-making.That the planning went through all the process, detailed designs and construction drawings, then to make a U-turn on it, is not good enough by Tusla. There clearly has been a breakdown in appropriate governance there and proper planning. We should not waste people's time or, indeed, taxpayers' money. The waste there of taxpayers' money resides in the fact that resources are going to be spent elsewhere to offer a medium-term solution, while the longer term solution has gone through the procurement, planning and design stages. It is not for me to be the arbiter of what is or is not value for money. That is for Tusla and the Minister to consider. However, to go so far down the road and do a U-turn is very unsatisfactory for the developer and many who would like to have seen this project be realised. There need to be more questions asked and clarity given by Tusla on this particular project. I reiterate my thanks to the Minister of State for the clarity she has been able to shed on the project with the update on the progress made so far.
Emer Higgins (Dublin Mid West, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source
I thank the Senator for his comments. I appreciate that this is not the news that he or his constituents are seeking. However, as he said, at least it is some level of clarity.
Tusla remains committed to providing the infrastructure and accommodation required to support vulnerable children, young people and families. Equally, it has responsibility to ensure that all investment decisions represent the best use of public funds. In this particular case, despite what I was told was extensive engagement, protracted negotiations and legal mediation, Tusla has concluded that the terms proposed by the developer did not represent appropriate value for money over the lifetime of the proposed lease and accordingly has decided not to proceed. Tusla recognises the impact of construction inflation. As a result, it made a significant uplift on its original offer. The additional increase sought could not be justified, however, when benchmarked against comparable projects across both Tusla and the HSE. That comes back to the value-for-money argument.
While it is very disappointing that this project could not proceed on the terms proposed, it is essential that all public investment decisions are guided by strong governance, rigorous scrutiny and a steadfast commitment to value for money. As mentioned previously, the Minister, Deputy Foley, wishes to reassure the local community that the need for services in Castlebar remains a priority. That is why a medium-term accommodation solution has been secured. Identifying and delivering a sustainable, long-term solution for the Senator's area remains a priority.