Dáil debates

Thursday, 22 June 2017

Ceisteanna - Questions - Priority Questions

Brexit Issues

4:20 pm

Photo of Willie PenroseWillie Penrose (Longford-Westmeath, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

4. To ask the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine his plans to ensure that single farm payments and the overall CAP budget are not affected in the current EU budget up to 2020 when the UK withdraws from the EU; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [28470/17]

Photo of Willie PenroseWillie Penrose (Longford-Westmeath, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I congratulate the Minister of State, Deputy Doyle, on his well-deserved reappointment. The biggest challenge facing rural Ireland is Brexit. The €1.7 billion received by Irish farmers annually must be guaranteed in any post-Brexit adjustment to the EU budget. The Government must ensure that this vital EU funding stream is protected. The UK contributes about 12% of the EU budget with a net contribution of about €12.9 billion. That will be lost post-2020. A 12% cut to the CAP will have a devastating impact on Irish farmers as EU payments account for 65% of Irish family farm incomes. It is clearly critical for thousands of Irish farmers that those payments are preserved. Brexit is also a big challenge for the agrifood sector, the biggest it has faced in decades. It will be acutely felt by that sector. I want to make sure we are on top of our brief and ahead of the curve on this matter.

Photo of Andrew DoyleAndrew Doyle (Wicklow, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I thank Deputy Penrose for his good wishes. I am extremely conscious of the importance of the CAP budget to Ireland's agriculture sector. The UK's withdrawal from the EU has been independently estimated to be likely to lead to a reduction of circa €10 billion, which will undoubtedly put pressure on the availability of funding for the future CAP. In the meantime, the amount of CAP funding per member state for Pillar 1 direct payments and Pillar 2 is fixed until 2020 in regulations of the Council and European Parliament. It would require a co-decided amendment of these regulations to change the figures. The only adjustment variable within that overall budget is expenditure on market supports, which is not allocated on a member state basis.

In my view, maintaining a strong CAP budget is one of the key challenges in the context of the multi-annual financial framework post-2020. The CAP budget is likely to come under increasing pressure, given the possibility that the overall EU budget will be reduced after 2020. Furthermore, there has been ongoing pressure from some member states to reduce the proportion of CAP spending within the overall EU budget and to divert this spending to newer priorities such as migration, defence and security. Brexit is also a significant factor and the loss of the UK contribution to the overall EU budget will undoubtedly put further pressure on the availability of funding for the CAP in the future.

Ireland will continue to negotiate for a strong and well financed CAP and seek to build alliances with member states with a common interest in supporting the EU's farm sector and consumers.

Ultimately, the CAP is funded by taxpayers across European member states. It is critically important against that background to reinforce the legitimacy and importance of the CAP and its role in achieving European priorities and objectives in areas such as employment creation and retention; food security; food safety and quality; the protection and enhancement of the environment; the development of the rural economy; and the prevention of land abandonment and rural depopulation. I strongly believe the CAP has evolved considerably and very effectively in recent years in response to changing market, consumer and environmental demands. It also plays a central role in delivering the smart, sustainable and inclusive growth sought under the Europe 2020 strategy.

I can assure Deputy Penrose that Ireland's objectives are clear as we enter into a new discussion on the financial perspectives and the shape of CAP post-2020. I will be working with Government colleagues, other member states and the EU institutions to secure the best possible outcome for the Irish agrifood sector.

Photo of Willie PenroseWillie Penrose (Longford-Westmeath, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The negative impact of Brexit on the CAP budget is glaringly obvious. I reckon the UK contributes €12.9 billion to EU coffers. Clearly, unless addressed by significantly increased contributions by the member states, there will be a significant negative impact on CAP and direct payments to farmers.

The EU budget is around 1% of EU GDP. That is far too small for a Union of 520 million people, or approximately 445 million people and 27 member states once the British have left. There is glaring incapacity at European level to support the ambitions of the EU treaties. That is the kernel of this. There will be debate as to whether we are for a Union capable of helping member states to tackle serious economic and social deficits. The current range of crises facing the EU is great and includes Brexit. There will be a serious rethink by member states about the budget and there will be resistance to the EU reforming and developing its own resources as envisaged in the treaties. There is huge resistance. We will have to be behind that, otherwise our State is going to be asked to contribute from its own coffers. Such a proposal will not meet with uniform acceptance. There will be sectoral resistance. We had better start getting this right and informing farmers who will have to come on board in a conjoined way and supportive way. Whoever is in government here by then will face a huge challenge.

Photo of Andrew DoyleAndrew Doyle (Wicklow, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I can only agree with everything the Deputy has said. It is a huge challenge. It was going to be a challenge even if the UK had voted to stay because of the competing demands for the EU budget and because the perception of what CAP is about has been misconstrued and misunderstood for many years. It depends on the member state. During the last period of CAP negotiations, former Commissioner Ciološ's support for a more or less intact CAP budget was based on the principles of producing food sustainably, sourcing as much food as possible from within the EU, and protecting rural economies. That is why the likes of greening came in along with other environmental measures.

As I said in my reply, we have moved the CAP considerably from its earlier manifestations. It still needs to evolve and, furthermore, it needs to move towards what consumers and taxpayers across Europe want. We still have a huge challenge which is compounded by the fact that there will be a net loss from Brexit. The figure varies between €10 billion and €14 billion, depending on who one talks to. We took the lower estimate, which is still a frightening amount.

Photo of Willie PenroseWillie Penrose (Longford-Westmeath, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I am in between, at €12.9 billion.

Photo of Andrew DoyleAndrew Doyle (Wicklow, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

There is no doubt that we need allies. There will be trade-offs. The last CAP was concluded under the Irish Presidency and under the aegis of the former Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Deputy Simon Coveney. Much of the ground work was done with Commissioner Ciološ. It is important to build alliances and create understanding of what we are about.

One statistic that is a little bit concerning is that the EU 28 are currently about 100% self sufficient in food production. With the UK gone, we will be at 115% or 116%. That void will have to be filled. The British are going to have to buy food but we are going to have to sell it.

Photo of Willie PenroseWillie Penrose (Longford-Westmeath, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

I would be suggesting safeguards such as seeking a suspension of state aid rules for two to three years. Small and medium enterprises dealing with the agrifood industry that are highly reliant on the UK market must be brought to the table. Solutions have to be found for the huge cross-Border trade in milk, livestock and other agricultural products. We have factories such as Lakeland and others that operate across both sides of the Border. Trade adjustment funds may well have to be formulated to support businesses in these areas. The Minister of State is acutely aware that the UK is deficient in beef. The British are now going to be looking for alternative sources.

This facilitates Argentinian beef imports.

Another issue is that a significant element of Irish exports are transited through Britain and, clearly, a difficulty will arise with that. Will we face the reintroduction of veterinary certificates for beef exports to other EU member states if they are transited through the UK? The impact of Brexit on bloodstock sales has been clearly set out by Deputy Martin Kenny. We heard about it already from Mr. Kavanagh. There are major areas involved and the Common Agricultural Policy, CAP, is just one aspect of it.

I believe we will have to set up some sort of a special unit within the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine that is properly staffed and resourced to tackle this fundamental problem that we will face during the next two to three years. We want to be ahead of the curve but we are falling a little behind the curve in terms of our preparation and anticipation of what will happen.

4:30 pm

Photo of Andrew DoyleAndrew Doyle (Wicklow, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

On the Deputy's final point, I should point out that as soon as David Cameron announced he was going to hold a referendum the Department put together a contingency team. Once the referendum vote had taken place the Department established a Brexit unit. It is managed by an assistant secretary general but is answerable at all times to the Secretary General. As I said, Brexit is a standing item on the agenda of the high level implementation committee. Of all the Departments, the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine was the most concerned about it and the most hopeful that it would not happen, but it was ready and it is working as best it can. As has been said to me several times, Brexit is not an Irish policy, it is a UK policy, but we have not got those in the UK to sit down talk in any meaningful way about it. They are only starting, and we saw the opening salvos yesterday with the Queen's speech.

Photo of Willie PenroseWillie Penrose (Longford-Westmeath, Labour)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

They might yet reverse the decision.