Written answers

Thursday, 25 April 2024

Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection

Pension Provisions

Photo of Robert TroyRobert Troy (Longford-Westmeath, Fianna Fail)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

21. To ask the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection her assessment of the impact of the Supreme Court's recent decision to award a pension to a widower who was not married but had children with his former partner; if this will have an impact on other retrospective and future cases; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [18202/24]

Photo of Heather HumphreysHeather Humphreys (Cavan-Monaghan, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

Under the law as currently enacted, entitlement to a Widows, Widowers or Surviving Civil Partner’s Contributory pension is only available to a surviving partner who was party to a marriage or civil partnership.

On Monday 22nd January the Supreme Court delivered its judgment in relation to the entitlement of an unmarried co-habitant to a Widows, Widowers or Surviving Civil Partner’s Contributory pension. The Supreme Court judgment overruled a previous High Court decision and found in favour of the claimant and his children.

In simple terms, the Court found that section 124 of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005 (as amended) is inconsistent with the Constitution insofar as it excluded the claimant from the category of persons entitled to benefit from it. The Court reached that conclusion on the basis of the equality guarantee contained in Article 40.1 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court judgment notes that in order to resolve the issue raised by the judgment, a legislative amendment is required.

My officials and the Office of the Attorney General are now considering the very detailed judgment, including the legislative changes required to respond to this decision. This will be done with all expediency.

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Photo of Catherine ConnollyCatherine Connolly (Galway West, Independent)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

22. To ask the Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection what value-for-money analysis has been carried out in relation to the different rates of participation in the proposed automatic enrolment pension scheme; the different rates of opt-outs; the different rates of suspension; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [18377/24]

Photo of Heather HumphreysHeather Humphreys (Cavan-Monaghan, Fine Gael)
Link to this: Individually | In context | Oireachtas source

The introduction of an automatic enrolment (AE) retirement savings system is a Programme for Government commitment and a key priority for me as Minister for Social Protection. Implementation of the AE system is well underway, with the Automatic Enrolment Retirement Savings System Bill 2024 now having completed Second Stage in the Dáil and a tender process to contract for administration services being well advanced. Enrolment of the first participants is expected to commence in January 2025.

The Deputy will be familiar with the analysis contained within the Regulatory Impact Assessment that accompanied the General Scheme of the Bill when it was approved by Government in July 2022. This document sets out the main options available to Government and the policy justifications for each approach. That document describes how the now agreed design of AE is understood to be the best solution to the problem of low pension coverage and low pension adequacy, particularly among private sector workers.

When AE launches, the number of workers who will meet the eligibility criteria is approximately 750,000-800,000. This is based on data provided by the Revenue Commissioners. AE has some unique features, but insofar as it is comparable to other quasi-mandatory pension schemes around the world, we can be confident that opt-out rates will be low. When conducting costings and financing estimates, my departmental officials typically assume a 90% adherence rate for AE participants. This is partly due to the UK comparator, which, as I understand it, has a current opt-out rate of 10.4%. Given that the AE scheme is a very attractive offering for participants, I expect that the opt-out rate will be even lower in Ireland.

Under the final design principles of the AE system, the State will make a contribution to participant’s retirement savings funds at a rate of €1 for every €3 saved by the employee. In estimating the costs of this State contribution, and assuming that 90% of enrollees will remain enrolled in the scheme, the full year cost of the State top-up is estimated to be €138 million in 2025. By Year 10, when the full contribution rates are phased in, the full annual cost is estimated to be €760 million.

While the cost of incentivising AE appears to be significant, it represents an investment in retirement savings in order to safeguard the standard of living of the retired population in the future. Accordingly, it is expected that the investment made now will be returned to the economy in higher levels of expenditure by retired people in the future.

With regard to the costs associated with the operation of the National Automatic Enrolment Retirement Savings Authority, the intention is for the Authority to become self-financing from fees charged to the participants over 10 to 15 years following its establishment.

I hope that this clarifies matters for the Deputy.

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.