Seanad debates
Wednesday, 10 March 2010
Multi-Unit Developments Bill 2009: Committee Stage
3:00 pm
Ivana Bacik (Independent)
As amendment No. 28 is the same as amendment No. 27, I am grateful to learn that the Minister intends to accept this principle. The purpose of amendment No. 28 was to address an omission the Labour Party had observed in the Bill, which was that the section did not require transfer of the reversion to the management company. Clearly, the Minister now has addressed this omission in amendment No. 27. I am grateful he has accepted the principle and am delighted that, essentially, he has taken on board amendment No. 28.
Amendment agreed to.
Amendment No. 28 not moved.
No comments