Michael Collins (Cork South West, Independent) | Oireachtas source

The financial instability of RTÉ, a matter that was starkly highlighted by the scandal in 2023, continues to echo throughout Ireland. The broadcaster's heavy reliance on the licence fee, which is funded by taxpayers, underscores its precarious financial position. This dependence is a stark reminder of the broadcaster’s financial vulnerability and it raises questions about the sustainability of this model in the long term.

The Government's lack of decisive action in addressing this issue is a cause for concern. While the Sinn Féin motion to reform the television licence fee model may appeal to the masses, it fails to offer a holistic solution to RTÉ's challenges. In fact, it risks imposing the full weight of the broadcaster’s inefficiencies on the taxpayer. This approach could potentially burden taxpayers with the full cost of the broadcaster’s inefficiencies, which is not a sustainable or fair solution.

Whatever the future model of payment in regard to the television licence, it is crucial to diversify the distribution of public sector broadcasting funds. At present, RTÉ is the primary recipient of these funds. However, a more equitable distribution of these funds would involve allocating to areas like local radio, for example, to my own local stations, 96 FM, Red FM and 103 FM. They need to be fairly funded, the same as everybody else, and they seem to have struggles much of the time. There is also Gript.ie and local newspapers like the Southern Star. The funding issue has to be discussed as this would stimulate a more diverse and resilient media landscape. That strategy would not only promote competition but also guarantee that a plurality of perspectives, viewpoints and voices is heard, which is essential for a healthy democracy.

While the Sinn Féin motion represents a positive step, it is not the cure for all of RTÉ's problems. A more comprehensive, democratic and inclusive strategy is required to truly transform the broadcaster and regain public trust.

See this speech in context