Dáil debates

Thursday, 2 May 2024

Ceisteanna ar Pholasaí nó ar Reachtaíocht - Questions on Policy or Legislation

 

12:50 pm

Photo of Michael McNamaraMichael McNamara (Clare, Independent) | Oireachtas source

In March, the High Court struck down returns to the UK. The judgment states that in October 2021:

the UK authorities advised that the Applicant had been convicted on an offence [...] in the UK and was in consequence registered as a sex offender. It appears that this information had been redacted by reason of data protection concerns before being placed on [his] immigration file.

It also states:

an "alert" was subsequently created on the 14th of January, 2022 on Applicant A's file [...] on the Minister’s database. It seems that it was only on the 14th of December, 2023, that an official in the [...] Department noticed the "alert".

The judgment also stated:

it cannot be overlooked that information relating to Applicant A's conviction for a sexual offence was in the possession of the Minister's agents since October, 2021 without steps being taken to raise with Applicant A his obligations under Irish law to register as a sex offender[...]. I am troubled that this fact has not come to light sooner given the purpose of maintaining a sex offenders register as a safety and control measure in the public interest.

Does the Tánaiste have confidence in the Department of Justice and the stewardship of that Department?

Comments

No comments

Log in or join to post a public comment.